It’s time for Medicare for All

Read and share this as much as possible, information is power.

This moment, right now, is an amazing opportunity for lawmakers to improve their country.  Even with congressional majorities and the White House, Republicans were unable to repeal Obamacare because of massive public mobilization in support of the law. This happened because Americans understand that government being involved in health insurance is a good thing, and they loudly opposed any reduction in government involvement. Now it is time for lawmakers to do what the majority of Americans want them to do. It is time for America’s health care system to catch up with the rest of the world. It is time to end the suffering of millions of poor, scared, sick people. It is time for Medicare for All.

Implementation would not be overly complicated because it would merely require the scaling-up of an already existing government program. The bill could be as simple as removing Medicare’s eligibility requirements and increasing payroll taxes to pay for it.

Medicare for All would have significant practical benefits. Overall administrative costs for the American healthcare system would decrease significantly. Private insurance companies typically spend 10% to 15% of their total costs on administrative costs. Medicare spends around 2% on administrative costs. (1) Individuals would no longer have to contend with complicated insurance applications and reimbursement procedures and red tape; they would just pay their taxes and go to the doctor. Employers would no longer have to contend with the massive costs of insuring every full-time worker and maintaining a larger human resources division. They would no longer have to cut workers’ hours to just below full-time so they don’t have to pay for the worker’s health insurance- they could just pay their taxes and go to the doctor.

Medicare for All would also be wildly popular. 53% of Americans now support a Medicare for All system, including 55% of independents and 28% of Republicans, according to a June 2017 poll from the Kaiser Family Foundation (2). Even Donald Trump’s core supporters, working and middle class rural whites, may support Medicare for All. Remember, Trump’s supporters cheered for his promises of “great healthcare,” not free-market healthcare.

Above all, extending Medicare to everybody is a moral imperative.

The ability to go to the doctor and receive quality medical care is recognized the world over as a basic human right, yet millions of Americans do not currently have that right because they cannot easily afford it. In the greatest nation on Earth, millions of people get sick and do not get better because they cannot afford to. They live harder and shorter lives, not because of a lack of technology or national poverty, but because those individuals can’t afford insurance. This is unacceptable. NOBODY IN THE GREATEST NATION ON EARTH SHOULD HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT GOING TO THE DOCTOR. PERIOD.

 

 

SOURCES:

 

  1. https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/ReportsTrustFunds/Downloads/TR2015.pdf

2)http://www.kff.org/health-reform/poll-finding/data-note-modestly-strong-but-malleable-support-for-single-payer-health-care/

Advertisements

An Easy Obamacare Fix

As the Republican plan to “repeal and replace” Obamacare falls apart in the Senate, it is becoming increasingly likely that Republicans and Democrats will be forced to work together to essentially fix Obamacare. Now, I believe, and the evidence shows, that Obamacare was a good law. A whole lot of people’s lives got a whole lot easier because of Obamacare. However, it was not a perfect law., and it made some peoples lives- mostly people with bare bones insurance plans that were outlawed by Obamacare- harder. There are improvements that can be made, and today I’ll detail a simple one that Republicans actually got right in the BCRA: Extending premium tax credits and subsidies below 100% of the poverty line.

Under current law, premium tax credits and payment subsidies only cover people whose income is between 100% and 400% of the federal poverty level, or FPL. People whose income is below 100% of FPL were supposed to  be covered by the Obamacare Medicaid expansion, which expanded Medicaid from a program that only covered vulnerable low-income populations-pregnant women, children, mothers, the disabled- into a program that covers all low income individuals, including childless adults. However, 19 states still have not expanded their Medicaid program to cover childless adults who live below the poverty line. This situation leaves those individuals- childless adults with incomes below the poverty line in non-expansion states- in an odd situation: they are not covered by Medicaid, so they have to buy their own insurance,  but they do not qualify for federal premium subsidies because they do not make over 100% FPL. These individuals are far too poor to afford private insurance without subsidies, so they stay uninsured.

In a perfect world, the 19 non-expansion states would stop intentionally harming their own citizens and accept the Medicaid expansion, allowing this population to be covered by Medicaid. However, we do not live in a perfect world, so the next-best solution is to remove the lower income limit on premium subsidies, extending them to individuals below 100% of FPL. This is the right thing to do, not only because it will allow millions of people to receive health insurance, but because it will bring in a much-needed population to insurance pools: young people.

This population- poor, childless adults- skews very young, mostly because older people in poverty typically have children and therefore qualify for Medicaid. Many of them were on Medicaid as a child, but lost coverage when they turned 18. They are often college or community college students who are young and healthy and cannot afford a $200+ monthly insurance premium on their near-minimum-wage incomes. By extending premium subsidies to this population they could be brought into the private insurance market. This would help to stabilize the marketplace by increasing the amount of young, healthy people in insurance pools.

This extension of subsidies appeals to both parties; Democrats like it because it expands insurance coverage, and we already know that Republicans like it because it was their idea. Most importantly, an extension of premium subsidies to individuals with incomes below the poverty line will make a lot of peoples lives easier by allowing them to afford insurance coverage and, as an added bonus, by stabilizing insurance markets through an influx of younger, childless people. An extension of premium subsidies to people in poverty should be a part of any Obamacare fix.